This post forms the first
in a series, and comes out of my continued attempts to critically ‘think
through writing’ about my role and the role of a writing centre within an
academic institution, particularly within the current climate of transformation. My perspective is grounded
in the South African context and my experience is based solely on the
University of Cape Town’s writing centres, which I have been involved with for
the past 6 years.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last week, in a meeting
with a respected academic from a well-known South African university, I was
surprised to hear her say that her university doesn’t have a writing centre.
However, my surprise turned to shock as she went on to say that not only do
they not have a writing centre, but that she and her colleagues continue to
advocate against a writing centre.
Who could possibly be against a writing centre?
As she continued to
speak, I learned something about the history of South African writing centres, something I am
ashamed of. While this past is not true for all Writing Centres, it was the lived experience for some and as such, I think it needs to be acknowledged in order for us to move
forward.
It seems that writing
centres were not always the supportive, empowering spaces that many of them are
today. Writing centres have a dark past of shadowy damp basements where
students were sent to be punished for plagiarism, where struggling students
were sent to be “fixed”, where black students were sent to learn “proper
English”, where spelling, grammar and referencing were the gospel and where the
university held all the power.
It’s enough to give you
cold shivers.
These spaces are rightly
remembered as demeaning, punitive and remedial and apparently, for some universities,
this remembrance has forever tainted their perception of what a writing centre
can be. It is also this past that has
prompted certain institutions, such as UCT, to take a rather different approach
to writing centres.
This idea, of what a
writing centre can be, is something I have been percolating over for some time
now. With transformation being the watchcry of the year, knowing where we are
now, where we aim to be and how we’re going to get there has become of
immediate importance.
Like hungry children, students have grown tired of asking and are now demanding to be fed. And, like the guilty parents we are, we can no
longer placate them with 2 minute noodles. We need to roll up our sleeves, peel
the vegetables and put in the effort required to produce a nutritious and
satisfying meal.
Regardless of your feelings towards the student movements
of 2015, notably #RhodesMustFall and #FeesMustFall, what is undeniable is that
they provided a powerful catalyst for social change - a form of social
punctuated-equilibrium.
Transformation
is defined as a marked change in form, nature or appearance. With this in mind,
the question becomes, can we ever really transform unless we first take a long
hard candid look at where we’ve been?
For me, the first step to
moving forward is looking back. This process may feel painful, shameful or
frustrating. Yet all of us, regardless of our role and whether we lived the
past or have merely inherited it, must take responsibility – this is our mess
to clean up, even if we didn’t make it.
As a writing centre, that means acknowledging that our
roots come out of a colonialist space, where white was right and English was
salvation. It means acknowledging that at their inception, writing centres were
about more than just teaching a universal means of communication, but also insidiously
about power and control; about privileging and prioritising particular cultures
and languages above all others, about using language to control access to
knowledge and opportunity, and about reinforcing a particular socio-political
ideology.
If we’re honest, writing centres come out of a really ugly
place. And, although this is not the end of our story, I think we need to sit
with this for a time and reflect.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As this is an ongoing series, I welcome constructive
comments, productive dialogue and diverse perspectives.
No comments:
Post a Comment